Picture
I am a Driscoll fan (I know, I know, shoot me). While he may indeed be a tad overwhelming at times I think he brings something to the table that is rare within the Church today. Jenny got me Vintage Church for Xmas, a book that I have been coveting for some time now, and although I am only 63 pages in, it is quickly becoming an all-time favorite. 
The book is all about the church; what it is, what it isn't, and what that means. He gives, what is in my opinion, a great working definition of the local church, something which has been kind of overlooked throughout our history. He states:
The local church is a community of regenerated believers who confess Jesus Christ as Lord. In obedience to Scripture they organize under qualified leadership, gather regularly for preaching and worship, observe the biblical sacraments of baptism and Communion, are unified by the Spirit, are disciplined for holiness, and scatter to fulfill the Great Commandment and the Great Commission as missionaries to the world for God's glory and their joy. (Mark Driscoll, Vintage Church (Wheaton,IL: Crossway Books, 2008) 36)
I think this is a great definition of what the visible, local church is, and while it doesn't take into account the invisible, universal church it gives us an applicable foundation to combine orthopraxy (right practice) with our orthodoxy (right belief)!

 


Comments

Michelle
09/01/2011 1:07pm

As you can probably guess I don't support all of Driscoll's interpretations but I am not dismissive of his teachings as a whole. I may be very wrong but he always comes across as a legalist and Pharisee to me. He is intimidating. But I am interested in what he has to say. Perhaps I can borrow this book when you have finished?

Reply
Shannon
23/01/2011 3:21pm

...organize under qualified leadership...ok while that may be fashionable, I fail to see it in the pattern laid out in the book

Reply
duffy
24/01/2011 7:42am

The Church at Philippi had organized leadership (1:1) as did Ephesus (Acts 20:28; Tim), as did Crete (Tit). Paul wanted Titus to appoint elders in "every city" (Tit 1:5). 2John is (arguably) written to Church leadership, as is 3John.In Revelation, Ephesus (2:1), Smyrna (2:8), Pergamos (2:12), Thyatira (2:18), Sardis (3:1), Philadelphia (3:7), Laodicea (3:14) all seems to have had leadership; angel=messenger=pastor. James was the leader of the Jerusalem Church (Acts 15:13). And traditionally, Peter is said to have been the bishop of Antioch, and later Rome.

Reply



Leave a Reply